Sponsored Document from
Cancer Cell
Cancer Cell. 2018 May 14; 33(5): 829–842.e5.
doi: [10.1016/j.ccell.2018.04.004]
PMCID: PMC5956280
PMID: 29763623
Molecular, Pathological, Radiological, and Immune Profiling of Non-brainstem Pediatric High-Grade Glioma from the HERBY Phase II Randomized Trial
Alan Mackay,1,2 Anna Burford,1,2 Valeria Molinari,1,2 David T.W. Jones,3,4 Elisa Izquierdo,1,2 Jurriaan Brouwer-Visser,6 Felice Giangaspero,7,8 Christine Haberler,9,10 Torsten Pietsch,11 Thomas S. Jacques,12,13 Dominique Figarella-Branger,14 Daniel Rodriguez,15 Paul S. Morgan,15 Pichai Raman,16,17 Angela J. Waanders,16,18 Adam C. Resnick,16,17,18 Maura Massimino,19 Maria Luisa Garrè,20 Helen Smith,21 David Capper,22,23,24 Stefan M. Pfister,3,4,5 Thomas Würdinger,25 Rachel Tam,26 Josep Garcia,21 Meghna Das Thakur,26 Gilles Vassal,27 Jacques Grill,27 Tim Jaspan,15 Pascale Varlet,28 and Chris Jones1,2,29,∗
Alan Mackay
1Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK2Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
Find articles by Alan Mackay
Anna Burford
1Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK2Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
Find articles by Anna Burford
Valeria Molinari
1Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK2Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
Find articles by Valeria Molinari
David T.W. Jones
3Hopp Children's Cancer Center at the NCT Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany4Division of Paediatric Neuro-oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
Find articles by David T.W. Jones
Elisa Izquierdo
1Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK2Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
Find articles by Elisa Izquierdo
Jurriaan Brouwer-Visser
6Roche Innovation Center, New York, NY, USA
Find articles by Jurriaan Brouwer-Visser
Felice Giangaspero
7Department of Radiology, Oncology and Anatomic-Pathology Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy8IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
Find articles by Felice Giangaspero
Christine Haberler
9Institute of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria10Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Find articles by Christine Haberler
Torsten Pietsch
11DGNN Brain Tumor Reference Center, Institute of Neuropathology, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
Find articles by Torsten Pietsch
Thomas S. Jacques
12UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK13Department of Histopathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
Find articles by Thomas S. Jacques
Dominique Figarella-Branger
14Department of Pathology and Neuropathology, La Timone Hospital, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France
Find articles by Dominique Figarella-Branger
Daniel Rodriguez
15Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK
Find articles by Daniel Rodriguez
Pichai Raman
16The Center for Data Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA17Division of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Find articles by Pichai Raman
Angela J. Waanders
16The Center for Data Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA18Division of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Find articles by Angela J. Waanders
Adam C. Resnick
16The Center for Data Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA17Division of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
18Division of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Find articles by Adam C. Resnick
Maura Massimino
19Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
Find articles by Maura Massimino
Maria Luisa Garrè
20Centro di Neuro-Oncologia, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
Find articles by Maria Luisa Garrè
David Capper
22Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany23Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Neuropathology, Berlin, Germany
24Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Heidelberg and Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
Find articles by David Capper
Stefan M. Pfister
3Hopp Children's Cancer Center at the NCT Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany4Division of Paediatric Neuro-oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
5Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
Find articles by Stefan M. Pfister
Thomas Würdinger
25Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Find articles by Thomas Würdinger
Gilles Vassal
27Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology and Unite Mixte de Recherche 8203 du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
Find articles by Gilles Vassal
Jacques Grill
27Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology and Unite Mixte de Recherche 8203 du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
Find articles by Jacques Grill
Pascale Varlet
28Sainte-Anne Hospital, Paris-Descartes University, Paris, France
Find articles by Pascale Varlet
Chris Jones
1Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK2Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
Find articles by Chris Jones
1Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
2Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
3Hopp Children's Cancer Center at the NCT Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany
4Division of Paediatric Neuro-oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
5Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
6Roche Innovation Center, New York, NY, USA
7Department of Radiology, Oncology and Anatomic-Pathology Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
8IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
9Institute of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
10Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
11DGNN Brain Tumor Reference Center, Institute of Neuropathology, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
12UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
13Department of Histopathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
14Department of Pathology and Neuropathology, La Timone Hospital, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France
15Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK
16The Center for Data Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
17Division of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
18Division of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
19Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
20Centro di Neuro-Oncologia, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
21F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
22Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
23Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Neuropathology, Berlin, Germany
24Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Heidelberg and Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
25Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
26Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
27Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology and Unite Mixte de Recherche 8203 du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
28Sainte-Anne Hospital, Paris-Descartes University, Paris, France
Chris Jones: ku.ca.rci@senoj.sirhc
∗Corresponding author ku.ca.rci@senoj.sirhc
29Lead contact
Received 2018 Jan 12; Revised 2018 Feb 28; Accepted 2018 Apr 10.
Copyright © 2018 The Author(s)
This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.
Summary
The HERBY trial was a phase II open-label, randomized, multicenter trial evaluating bevacizumab (BEV) in addition to temozolomide/radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed non-brainstem high-grade glioma (HGG) between the ages of 3 and 18 years. We carried out comprehensive molecular analysis integrated with pathology, radiology, and immune profiling. In post-hoc subgroup analysis, hypermutator tumors (mismatch repair deficiency and somatic POLE/POLD1 mutations) and those biologically resembling pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma ([PXA]-like, driven by BRAF_V600E or NF1 mutation) had significantly more CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and longer survival with the addition of BEV. Histone H3 subgroups (hemispheric G34R/V and midline K27M) had a worse outcome and were immune cold. Future clinical trials will need to take into account the diversity represented by the term “HGG” in the pediatric population.
Keywords: immune, CD8, MAPK, hypermutator, H3F3A, pediatric high-grade glioma
Significance
We validate in the prospective clinical trial setting the biological and clinical diversity of pediatric high-grade glioma previously described in large retrospective series, underpinned by detailed pathological and radiological analysis. Although adding bevacizumab (BEV) to standard temozolomide/radiotherapy did not improve survival across the whole cohort, we identify disease subgroups with MAPK activation to harbor an enhanced CD8+ T cell immune response, which may derive benefit from the addition of BEV. If confirmed in another study, this would represent a useful predictive biomarker for this regimen in these tumors, and points the way for therapeutic strategies for subgroups of children with high-grade glioma.
Introduction
High-grade gliomas (HGGs) in children, like their adult counterparts, continue to have a bleak prognosis, with a median overall survival (OS) of 9–15 months (Cohen et al., 2011, Jones et al., 2016, Ostrom et al., 2015). Recent integrated molecular-profiling initiatives have shown that pediatric HGGs (pHGGs) are biologically distinct from their adult counterparts, with subgroups of the disease marked by recurrent mutations in genes encoding histone H3 variants having different age of incidence, anatomical location, clinical outcome, and a range of biological parameters (Jones and Baker, 2014, Mackay et al., 2017, Paugh et al., 2010, Schwartzentruber et al., 2012, Sturm et al., 2012, Wu et al., 2012, Wu et al., 2014). Histone wild-type (WT) tumors have widely differing mutational burdens, ranging from infant cases (<3 years) driven by single gene fusion events through to patients with biallelic mismatch repair deficiency harboring some of the highest mutational rates in human cancer (Jones and Baker, 2014, Mackay et al., 2017, Shlien et al., 2015, Wu et al., 2014).
The rapid advances in our understanding of pHGGs have come predominantly from the accumulation of numerous disparate retrospective collections, a reflection of the rarity of the disease. Clinical trial cohorts with ancillary biomarker analyses have been relatively limited in their scope, and historically have focused on single-marker analyses. These include the Children's Oncology Group ACNS0126 (radiotherapy [RT]/temozolomide [TMZ]) (Cohen et al., 2011) and ACNS0423 (RT/TMZ followed by TMZ and lomustine) (Jakacki et al., 2016) studies, which report on the frequency and clinical correlations of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) expression (ACNS0126) (Jakacki et al., 2016, Pollack et al., 2006), IDH1 mutation (ACNS0423) (Pollack et al., 2011), as well as phosphorylated Akt expression (Pollack et al., 2010a) and microsatellite instability (both) (Pollack et al., 2010b). The CCG-945 study (“8 in 1” chemotherapy) (Finlay et al., 1995) reported on the prognostic significance of p53 expression/mutation (Pollack et al., 2002), in addition to the presence/absence of 1p19q co-deletion (Pollack et al., 2003b).
This last study (Pollack et al., 2003b) also highlighted the critical importance of pathological review in the diagnosis of pHGG, and subsequent interpretation of clinical trial results (Gilles et al., 2008, Pollack et al., 2003a), particularly in midline locations (Eisenstat et al., 2015). It has subsequently become clear that numerous histological subtypes of HGG can harbor distinct genetic drivers and have considerably better clinical outcomes, such as BRAF_V600E mutations in epithelioid glioblastoma (GBM), anaplastic ganglioglioma, and anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) (Hatae et al., 2016); in the latter two categories, this mutation is also found in lower-grade entities lacking obvious anaplasia. Additional histone WT cases of otherwise uncontroversial HGGs have been found to be biologically and clinically more similar to several types of low-grade glioma (LGG) and PXA (Korshunov et al., 2015), highlighting the importance of an integrated diagnosis combining molecular and histological features.
The HERBY trial (study BO25041; clinicaltrials.gov {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01390948","term_id":"NCT01390948"}}NCT01390948) was a phase II, open-label, randomized, multicenter, comparator study of the addition of the anti-angiogenic agent bevacizumab (BEV) to RT and TMZ in patients between the ages of 3 and 18 years with newly diagnosed non-brainstem HGG (Grill et al., 2018). Central confirmation of HGG diagnosis was mandatory before randomization, followed by consensus review by five independent expert neuropathologists. Real-time panel radiological assessment was also incorporated. An exploratory endpoint of the study was to establish a biospecimen repository for correlative molecular profiling. In addition to its role in tumor angiogenesis, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) restricts immune cell activity, and BEV has been demonstrated to facilitate recruitment of T cells to infiltrate tumors (Wallin et al., 2016), as well as increase the ratio of CD8+CD3+ T cells in adult GBM specimens (Scholz et al., 2016). We therefore also sought to explore the immune profile of cases within the HERBY cohort.
Results
The Translational Research Cohort Is Representative of the Whole Clinical Trial Population
The total HERBY cohort comprised 121 randomized patients at diagnosis (3–18 years) plus 3 infant cases (<3 years) at relapse. Of these, 113 patients consented to the translational research program (Table S1). Tumor tissue was collected from either resection (n = 93) or biopsy (n = 20), although 24 cases failed to provide sufficient quantity or quality of sample for molecular analysis. For the remaining 89 cases, material was available in the form of either fresh-frozen material (n = 36), formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded pathology specimens (n = 79), or both (n = 26). These were subjected to Sanger sequencing for H3F3A (n = 89), exome sequencing (n = 86), Illumina 450k methylation BeadChip profiling (n = 74), CD8 immunohistochemistry (n = 70), methylation-specific PCR for MGMT promoter methylation (n = 36), a capture-based sequencing panel for common fusion gene detection (n = 68), and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) (n = 20) (Figure 1A).
More information about this article:
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario
Los comentarios serán publicados una vez sean aceptados por el moderador del blog, por lo que no aparecerán instantaneamente. No se publicará ningún comentario que pueda causar alarma innecesaria. El objetivo del blog es informar y dar opciones a quien lo consulte.